Coming soon · GovSight
In development. Not yet open to customers.TeamingWorks runs the subcontract side of the work.
The government holds the prime responsible for the whole job. When a subcontractor misses scope or busts a bid, the prime absorbs it. TeamingWorks is the pipeline for the prime's project, capture, and subcontracts team. Break won scope into work packages, find specialist subs, solicit and evaluate them, and award subcontracts without quietly keeping their risk.
Hand the sub a parsed scope, not the whole solicitation.
Because the prime wrote the scope, it cannot cleanly push responsibility for missed work onto a sub. So primes forward the entire un-parsed solicitation and let the sub own whatever it misses. That buys legal cover and little else. Bids come back padded for ambiguity. The seams between packages go unmanaged.
TeamingWorks does the parse and proves it. The coverage check is deterministic. A model never decides whether scope is covered, so the guarantee holds even when the source is restricted or the AI is unavailable.
The guarantee
- Every prime obligation allocated to self-perform or a sub package.
- Every required flow-down clause mapped to the packages it reaches.
- Every seam between packages named and owned.
- Nothing left with the prime by accident.
Computed deterministically. Posture you can show a contracts director, not a model's best guess.
Work packages
Break the prime scope into discrete packages, one per trade or specialty. The PWS, the deliverables, the CDRLs, and the commitments from your winning proposal each carry an ID and an owner.
Coverage matrix
Every obligation maps to self-perform, a package, or nothing. The unallocated list is the scope that would otherwise stay yours by accident. It is computed in code, not guessed by a model.
Flow-down integrity
Every required clause mapped to the packages it has to reach. FAR 52.244-6, the DFARS cyber clause, wage determinations. A closing audit reconciles the executed subcontracts back to your prime obligations.
Bid review
Compare sub bids against the same scope. A price that lands far under the rest is execution risk to the prime, not a bargain. TeamingWorks flags the bid bust before award.
The same posture as PursuitWorks.
TeamingWorks runs on the platform behind PursuitWorks. Source scope is respected. The risk-integrity core is computed in code, not left to a model. Every gate has real artifacts and reviewers. A won pursuit in PursuitWorks flows straight into a TeamingWorks engagement, so the scope you committed to is the scope you decompose.